In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give answer:
- (A) If only conclusion I follows
- (B) If only conclusion II follows
- (C) If either I or II follows
- (D) If neither I nor II follows and
- (E) If both I and II follow.
Option D
According to the statement, 80% of the total runs were made by spinners. So, I does not follow. Nothing about the opening batsmen is mentioned in the statement. So, II also does not follow.
Statements: The old order changed yielding place to new. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option A
Clearly, I directly follows from the given statement. Also, it is mentioned that old ideas are replaced by new ones, as thinking changes with the progressing time. So, II does not follow.
Statements: Government has spoiled many top ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option E
According to the statement, Government has spoiled financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors. This means that only those persons should be appointed as Directors who are experts in finance and are acquainted with the financial work of the institute. So, both I and II follow.
Statements: Population increase coupled with depleting resources is going to be the scenario of many developing countries in days to come. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option B
The fact given in I is quite contrary to the given statement. So, I does not follow. II mentions the direct implications of the state discussed in the statement. Thus, II follows.
Statements: Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option B
The statement concentrates on the increasing viewership of TV. and does not stress either on increasing the readership of newspapers or making studies regarding the same. So, neither I nor II follows.
Statements: In Japan, the incidence of stomach cancer is very high, while that of bowel cancer is very low. But Japanese immigrate to Hawaii, this is reversed – the rate of bowel cancer increases but the rate of stomach cancer is reduced in the next generation. All this is related to nutrition – the diets of Japanese in Hawaii are different than those in Japan. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option D
The statement neither propagates the diet of any of the countries nor compares the two types of cancer. So, neither I nor II follows.
Statements: The Government run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option D
Nothing about the details of the employees’ income or the cause of their refusal to declare their income and assets, can be deduced from the given statement. So, neither I nor II follows.
Statements: Monitoring has become an integral part in the planning of social development programs. It is recommended that Management Information System be developed for all programmes. This is likely to give a feedback on the performance of the functionaries and the efficacy with which services are being delivered. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option E
According to the statement, monitoring and evaluation of social development programs – their function, performance and efficiency – is absolutely essential. So, both I and II follow.
Statements: The T.V. programmes, telecast specially for women are packed with a variety of recipes and household hints. A major portion of magazines for women also contains the items mentioned above. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option B
Clearly, nothing about ‘other things’ is mentioned in the statement. So, I does not follow, Also, since it is mentioned that programmes and magazines for women are stuffed with kitchen recipes and other household hints, it means that women have special interest in these areas. So, II follows.
Statements: The distance of 900 km by road between Bombay and Jafra will be reduced to 280 km by sea. This will lead to a saving of Rs. 7.92 crores per annum on fuel. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option B
According to the statement, sea transport is cheaper than road transport in the case of route from Bombay to Jafra, not in all the cases. So, conclusion I does not follow. The statement stresses on the saving of fuel. So, conclusion II follows.
Statements: The manager humiliated Sachin in the presence of his colleagues. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option D
The manager might have humiliated Sachin not because of his dislike but on account of certain negligence or mistake on his part. So, I does not follow. Also, nothing about Sachin’s rapport with his colleagues can be deduced from the statement. So, II also does not follow.
Statements: Women’s organisations in India have welcomed the amendment of the Industrial Employment Rules 1946 to curb sexual harassment at the work place. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option D
The fact that a certain rule has been more welcomed in a certain country does not imply that the problem is more prevalent there. So, I does not follow. Also, the amendment seeks to discourage only sexual harassment of women and shall in no way discourage employment of women. So, II also does not follow.
Statements:
|
Option D
Neither the citizens response to the decision nor the reason for opposition by other nations can be deduced from the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.
Statements: In a highly centralised power structure, in which even senior cabinet ministers are prepared to reduce themselves to pathetic countries or yesmen airing views that are primarily intended to anticipate or reflect the Prime Minister’s own performances, there can be no place for any consensus that is quite different from real or contrived unanimity of opinion, expressed through a well orchestrated endorsement of the leader’s actions. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option A
According to the statement, even senior cabinet ministers are always ready to conform to the Prime Minister’s views. So, I follows. However, II contradicts the given statement and so does not follow.
Statements: National Aluminium Company has moved India from a position of shortage to self-sufficiency in the metal. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option E
According to the statement, National Aluminium Company has moved India from a position of shortage in the past to self-sufficiency in the present. This means that previously, India had to import aluminium. So, I follows. Also, it can be deduced that if production increases at the same rate, India can export it in future. So, II also follows.
Statements: Jade plant has thick leaves and it requires little water. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option B
The statement talks of jade plants only and not ‘all plants with thick leaves’. So, I does not follow. Also, since jade plants require little water, so they can be grown in places where water is not in abundance. So, II follows.
Statements: Use “Kraft” colours. They add colour to our life. – An advertisement. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option D
The slogan given in the statement is definitely a catchy one which indicates that catchy slogans do attract people. So, I does not follow. Nothing about people’s preference for colours can be deduced from the statement. Thus, II also does not follow.
Statements: All those political prisoners were released on bail who had gone to jail for reasons other than political dharnas. Bail was not granted to persons involved in murders. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option B
According to the statement, the political prisoners can be divided into two groups – those who were released and those who were put in jail for political dharnas. However, no person involved in murder was released. This means that no political prisoner had committed murder. So, I follows. Clearly, II is not directly related to the statement and does not follow.
Statements: Modern man influences his destiny by the choice he makes unlike in the past. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option A
Clearly, I directly follows from the statement while II cannot be deduced from it.
Statements: Water supply in wards A and B of the city will be affected by about 50% on Friday because repairing work of the main lines is to be carried out. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option E
Clearly, the information has been given beforehand so that the residents can collect water on the previous day and use less water on Friday. So, both I and II follow.
Statements: People who speak too much against dowry are those who had taken it themselves. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option E
The statement clearly implies that it is easier to say than to do something and what people say is different from what they do. So, both I and II follow.
Statements: The national norm is 100 beds per thousand populations but in this state, 150 beds per thousand are available in the hospitals. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option B
Whether the national norm is appropriate or not cannot be said. So, I does not follow. However, more number of beds per thousand population are available in the state. So, II follows.
Statements: Our securities investments carry market risk. Consult your investment advisor or agent before investing. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option B
Investment in securities involves risk. This does not mean that one should not invest in securities. So, I does not follow. Since the statement advises one to consult investment advisor before investing, so II follows.
Statements: Money plays a vital role in politics. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option D
Neither the poor nor the rich, but only the role of money in politics is being talked about in the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.
Statements: Vegetable prices are soaring in the market. Conclusions:
| ||||||||||
|
Option D
The availability of vegetables is not mentioned in the given statement. So, I does not follow Also, II is not directly related to the statement and so it also does not follow.